Amsterdam Conference 22 – 23 June 2012

Reinventing Norbert Elias: For an open sociology

Programme and conference information: http://www.aissr.uva.nl/eliasconference

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Preliminary Programme, Anmsterdam Conference 22-23 June 2012

Preliminary program Reinventing Norbert Elias: For an open sociology

Amsterdam, 22 and 23 June 2012 

PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY  PROGRAM. THE FINAL PROGRAM WILL BE MADE AVAILABE ONLINE AROUND MAY 5.

Day 1: Friday 22 June 2012

9:00-9:30                 Coffee, tea

Plenary session 1: Reinventing Elias in the Netherlands 

9:30-9:35                 Welcome:  Rineke van Daalen & Giselinde Kuipers

9:35-9:45                 Jan Willem Duyvendak (University of Amsterdam): the legacy of Elias in Amsterdam

9:45-10:15               Justus Uitermark (Erasmus University Rotterdam): Elias 2.0 – The figurational dynamic of contemporary political struggle

10:15-10:45                 Nico Wilterdink (University of Amsterdam): Controversial science: Good and bad sociology

10:45-11:15                 Questions and & Discussion

11:15-11:30                 Coffee, tea

11:30-13:00 Session 1

Bodies 1:  The civilized body

Dieter Vandebroeck  (Free University Brussels) – Norbert Elias and the “obesity epidemic” dieter.vandebroeck@vub.ac.be

Michael Rees (University of Kent) – [title] mdr26@kent.ac.uk

Discussant: Bowen Paulle

Historical Sociology and Elias 1

Allison Moore (Edgehill University) –  Making Sense of Sexuality in the 21st Century through an Eliasian Lens or why we must revisit the past to understand the present. moorea@edgehill.ac.uk

Rineke van Daalen (University of Amsterdam) – The past in people’s minds. r.m.vandaalen@uva.nl

Freek de Haan (Erasmus University Rotterdam) – Chronos, Kairos, Aion: A Deleuzian reinvention of Elias as a complexity theorist. dehaan@fsw.eur.nl.

Discussants: Van Daalen, Postberg, Jderu. With sidekicks.

13:00-14:00 Lunch

14:00- 15:15 Session 2

Bodies 2: The performing body

Sylvia Holla (University of Amsterdam) – The Valuation and Devaluation of History in the Modelling Industry. s.m.holla@uva.nl

Anna Mann (University of Amsterdam) – Two version of one biological mechanism. “Tasting” performed in natural science experiments a.m.mann@uva.nl

Discussant: Michael Rees

Historical Sociology and Elias 2

Christian Postberg (University of Graz) – The power of money. The impact of the first silver discovery in the High Middle Ages on feudal power balances. postberg@freenet.de

Gabriel Jderu (University of Bucharest) – Motorcycle as Figuration: Three Stages of Motorcycling Culture in Romania. gabriel.jderu@sas.unibuc.ro

Discussants: Moore, De Haan. With sidekicks(!)

15:15-15:30 Coffee, tea

15:30- 17:30 Session 3

Emotions 1: Looking for new ways of control: on changing power balances and the management of behaviour and emotions

Amanda Rohloff (Brunel University) – “Hello Sunday Morning”! On the regulation of emotions and the management of identity in people who temporarily stop drinking alcohol. amanda.rohloff@brunel.ac.uk

Gary Sinclair –Heavy metal figurations: music and emotion in the digital age, gary.sinclair@dit.ie

Don Weenink (Wageningen University) – Shame and uncontrollable violence., don.weenink@wur.nl

Manuela Beyer (Free University Berlin) –  “Listen to Your Heart” – Historical Developments in Advice on Emotions in a German Youth Magazine manuela.beyer@fu-berlin.de

Discussant tba

National habitus and sociological comparison 1: habitus, nations and globalization 

Andreas Pickel (Trent University). The end may not be near: Conceptual foundations and empirical mechanisms of national culture and habitus. apickel@trentu.ca

Giselinde Kuipers (University of Amsterdam and Erasmus University Rotterdam) – The rise and decline of national habitus: Dutch cycling culture and the making of national similarity. g.m.m.kuipers@uva.nl

Dieter Reicher (University of Graz) – ‘Survival Unit’ and ‘National Habitus’. Problems of using these concepts by analyzing ethnic groups and nations without state. dieter.reicher@uni-graz.at

John Lever (JBL Research) The postliberal politics of halal: new trajectories in the civilizing process? john@jblresearch.org

Discussant tba

19:00 Dinner and the finish of the Short Intensive Course, given during the week before the conference by Robert van Krieken and Bart van Heerikhuizen. (Invited guests: Joop Goudsblom, Abram de Swaan, Bart van Heerikhuizen, Robert van Krieken, Stephen Mennell, Nico Wilterdink) 

Day 2: June 23

9:00 -9:30 Coffee, tea

Plenary session 2: Reinventing Elias: views from France and the UK

9:30 -10:15  Natalie Heinich (CNRS Paris) – Title tba heinich@ehess.fr

10:15-11:00  Jason Hughes (Brunel University) – Title tba. jason.hughes@brunel.ac.uk

11:00-11:15 Coffee, tea

11:15-12:45  Session 4

Emotions 2: Emotions, identities and groups

Angela Perulli (University of Florence) – Emotions and inequalities: the role of group charisma and group disgrace. angela.perulli@unifi.it

Thomas Gilbert (Elias and the Sociology of Ideas: Kierkegaard’s Either/Or as the Psychogenesis of Existentialism.  gilbert45701@gmail.com

Jette Westerbeek (Utrecht University) – The social construction of depression. j.a.westerbeek@uu.nl

Discussant tba

National habitus and sociological comparison 2: established and outsiders 

Artur Bogner (University of Bayreuth) – Outsiders without Groups? The Spectre of Groups without We-Images. Artur.Bogner@web.de

Marta Bucholc (University of Warsaw) – Outside the Moral Circle. Polish Political Refugees in Norway in the Nineteen Eighties: Between the Established and the Outsider Habitus. bucholcm@is.uw.edu.pl

Cas Wouters (Utrecht University) – Title tba

Discussant tba

12:45-13:45 Lunch

13:45-15:15 Session 5

Bodies 3: The trained body

Ramona Marinache (University of Bucharest) – Civilizing body, medicalizing sleep in Romania.  ramona. marinache@sas.unibuc.ro

Bowen Paulle & Bart van Heerikhuizen (University of Amsterdam) – The Bodily Dimension of Learning in Elias and Bourdieu. b.paulle@uva.nl & b.vanheerikhuizen@uva.nl

Discussant: Dieter van de Broeck

National habitus and national comparison 3: National styles and national comparisons 

Peter Ludes (Jacobs University Bremen) – Shifting Power Presentation Ratios in Chinese, German, and US Tele-Vision. p.ludes@jacobs-university.de

Johan Heilbron (Centre européen de sociologie et de science politique de la Sorbonne & Erasmus University Rotterdam – Reconceptualizing national traditions in the social sciences. heilbron@msh-paris.fr  & heilbron@fsw.eur.nl

Gad Yair (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) – The Israeli Post-Traumatic Habitus: Between Exile and Independence. msyairg@huji.ac.il

15:15-15:30 Coffee and tea

15:30-17:00  Concluding panel

17:00 Drinks 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Figurations Newsletter – new email address

Figurations, the Newsletter of the Norbert Elias Foundation, has a new email address and a new Managing Editor.

The new email address is: figurations@norberteliasfoundation.nl. Please use this address when submitting news, including news of recent publications, to the newsletter.

The new Managing Editor is Barbara Górnicka, who is writing her PhD in the UCD School of Sociology. She has already been collaborating with me in writing the last three issues of Figurations, but will now take on additional responsibilities, including keeping track of future contents.

Future issues will be published in January and July (instead of December and June). It continues to be printed and posted to subscribers, and is free of charge. If you wish to be added to the mailing list, send your postal address to the email address given above.

Past issues, from 1994 onwards, can be found on the Foundation’s website at: www.norberteliasfoundation.nl/figurations.php

Besides the Figurations newsletter, the Foundation also sponsors the new online journal Human Figurations, edited by Katie Liston. The similarity of the names will no doubt cause confusion, but the journal is a quite separate entity – see http://quod.lib.umich.edu/h/humfig/.

Stephen Mennell

Editor, Figurations

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Brett Bowden wins 2011 Norbert Elias Prize

The seventh Norbert Elias Prize, for the best book in sociology or a closely cognate field by a first-time author published in the years 2009–10 have been awarded to Brett Bowden for his book The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).

The jury consisted of three previous winners of the Norbert Elias Prize: Jason Hughes, Elizabeth Bernstein and Wilbert van Vree (chair).

Brett Bowden is Associate Professor of Politics and International Studies at the School of Humanities & Languages, and School-based Member of the Centre for Citizenship and Public Policy at the University of Western Sydney.

He has previously held appointments at the University of Queensland, Australian National University, and the University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy. He has held visiting positions in the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the University of Westminster in London, and in the Zentrum für Interdiszipläre Forschung at Bielefeld University in Germany.

The jury’s verdict 

Thematically pertinent and theoretically ambitious, Brett Bowden’s The Empire of Civilization is a sweeping history of the present that interrogates the role of civilisational discourses in the making of modern imperial sensibilities. Broad in scope and reach, Bowden engages with the fields of International Relations, intellectual history, and social and political theory, to produce an account that is highly relevant both to the historical and to the contemporary political field. His discussions of ‘revived imperialisms’, including the post-9/11 wars on terror and new forms of humanitarian and economic imperialism are particularly careful and nuanced. Overall, we found this book to be fascinating, insightful, and creative.

Bowden departs from Norbert Elias’s analysis in important respects through a focus on the conscious ‘proselytising crusades’ undertaken in the name of civilisation; we might think of these as akin to Elias’s notion of ‘civilising offensives’. In this respect, Bowden gives much greater prominence to the idea of civilisation as an amulet, a standard, and one that has been mobilised, often in the course of brutal conquest, to legitimise conscious campaigns to ‘civilise’ what were considered to be ‘primitive’ ‘others’. ‘Civilisation’, then, is intimately interrelated to the social conditions within which the idea takes form in a dual manner. Firstly, because (as Elias pointed out) it expresses the self-consciousness of particular Western peoples in particular periods, and secondly, because, according to Bowden, it is in itself ‘performative’ in the sense of being historically ‘implicated’ in Western triumphalism, imperialism and colonialism. For Bowden, a civilising process points less to long-term set of largely blind processes involving, simultaneously, interrelated process of state formation and shifting standards of behaviour, and more to the ‘evolution of an idea’ that has in itself engendered social change. To this end, the book might be considered overly-rationalistic in terms of its overall arguments, but it is nonetheless often rich in terms of its analysis – particularly in its illustration of how standards become enshrined in specific watchwords. This is impressive in scope, wide-ranging.

This socio-historical research into the meaning and use of the concept ‘civilisation’ (and related words such as ‘modernisation’, ‘development’, ‘progress’, ‘democracy’) demonstrates that this word family has represented superiority feelings of Western societies with regard to non-western societies since early-modern times until today.

It is an ambitious, well-written and insightful book. However, Bowden could have made better use the sociological concept of the civilising process developed by Norbert Elias. For instance, his analysis would perhaps have gained in value if he had, in explaining the historical changes in the concept of civilisation, referred to the more all-embracing and ‘blind’ long-term processes of social differentiation and integration and trans-generational behavioural change.

The Prize, consisting of €1,000, will be presented to Brett Bowden on behalf of of the Norbert Elias Foundation by Robert van Krieken, at an events to be organised in Sydney later this year.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Human Figurations journal now live online.

Human Figurations: Long-term Perspectives on the Human Condition is a new journal supported and sponsored by the Norbert Elias Foundation. The unifying theme of the journal Human Figurations is a broad concern with long-term processes of the development of human society and the human condition.

The first issue, with constributions by Peter Burke, Olle Edström, Barbara Evers, Johan Goudsbloom, Andrew Linklater, Joseph Maquire, , Peter Westbroek and Gary Wickham is now live online.

While Elias is best known for his theory of civilizing processes, he wrote on an astonishing range of topics, including violence, war, sport, ageing and dying, time, work, art, music, poetry, utopias and the relations between the sexes. Fundamentally, he advanced what have been called both a ‘post-philosophical’ theory of knowledge and the sciences, and an ‘historical social psychology’. His conception of the discipline of sociology was far broader than that which has now become institutionalized in the rather narrow departments of sociology in contemporary universities. In consequence, he inspires researchers from many disciplines, especially people working in the interstices between conventional disciplines: history (especially world historians and social historians), criminology, international relations, anthropology and political science. Human Figurations will attract contributions from across these fields, the unifying theme being a broad concern with long-term processes of the development of human society and the human condition.

Posted in Figurations, Human Figurations journal | 3 Comments

Funeral of Professor Willfried Spohn

It is with deep sorrow that we let you know that our friend and colleague Willfried Spohn was killed on Monday 16 January in a car accident while driving from Berlin to Wrocław. His funeral will take place on Thursday, 26 January, at 12 noon at the Friedhof Lichterfelde, Moltke Strasse 41a, 12203 Berlin.

Willfried was Professor of Economic and Social Sciences at the Willy Brandt Centre for German and European Studies, University of Wrocław. He was a co-founder of the International Sociological Association’s Thematic Group 02 Historical and Comparative Sociology, and its President from 2007 until 2010. Since the upgrade to Working Group status in 2010, which involved the incorporation of members of the Figurational Sociology Ad Hoc Group – a merger to which his contribution was central, Willfried Spohn had been WG02 Vice-President and an active and enthusiastic member, organiser, and dedicated participant in WG02 activities.

We were looking forward to several sessions Willfried had organised at the IIS congress in Delhi in February and at the ISA Forum in Buenos Aires in August. For those of you participating in those sessions, we will let you know in due time about the new arrangements.

We mourn the loss of a dear friend and a most accomplished and admirable scholar and colleague. Our thoughts are with his wife Ewa and his sons Max and Philipp.

Stephen Mennell
President

Manuela Boatca
Secretary/Treasurer

ISA WG02 Historical and Comparative Sociology


 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

CfP: Copenhagen deadline extended to 25 January

A large number of abstracts has already been submitted for the Copenhagen conference, but the organisers – Lars-Bo Kaspersen and Norman Gabriel – have nevertheless extended the deadline until 25 January to enable intending participants to gather their thoughts after Christmas. Revised details of the conference are pasted below.

Norbert Elias and Figurational Sociology: Prospects for the Future Copenhagen, 2–4 April 2012

Call for papers

Department of Political Science & Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 2–4 April, 2012.

The focus of this three-day conference will be on the development of figurational sociology in relation to other disciplines.  In ‘What is Sociology?’, Elias argues that sociology needs to develop new ways of ‘thinking’ about its relationship with other disciplines like biology and physics. But since that time, we have seen a rapid expansion of these academic disciplines, yet there has not been sufficient time to consider the theoretical implications of what this would mean for the future development of a figurational sociology. This conference will bring together sociologists, together with other important and relevant cognate disciplines – such as history, political science and economics – to explore attempts that integrate different disciplinary perspectives.

Keynote speakers include: Richard Kilminster, University of Leeds; Abram de Swaan, University of Amsterdam; Stephen Mennell, University College Dublin; Johan Goudsblom, University of Amsterdam; Søren Nagbøl, Aarhus University; Nina Baur, TU Berlin; Stefanie Ernst, Universität Magdeburg; Stephen Quilley, Keele University.

It will address these issues by focusing on the following themes: The first day will explore the ‘boundaries’ and relationships between figurational sociology and the following disciplines: 1) Politics 2) Economics 3) History 4) Psychology 5) Biology 6) Anthropology.

The second day will further discuss the major themes that emerge from this ‘boundary’ work across disciplines, considering some of their strengths and limitations in relation to the following 1) Survival Units 2) Organisational Sociology and Economic Sociology 3) Civilizing Processes 4) Informalising Processes 5) The expanding Anthroposphere (Environmental issues)

The conference will consist of plenary sessions with keynote speakers, followed by themed parallel sessions.

The new deadline for submitting abstracts of papers is 25 January 2012. These should be no more than 150 words and submitted to the conference email address: mcs@ifs.ku.dk We look forward to seeing you in Copenhagen!

Lars Bo Kaspersen, University of Copenhagen, LBK@ifs.ku.dk

Norman Gabriel, University of Plymouth, norman.r.gabriel@plymouth.ac.uk

 

Practicalities and formalities

Registration: Please register by sending a mail to Mette Cruse Skou mcs@ifs.ku.dk with your name, affiliation, address, phone number and email address.

Conference  fee: 50 euro covering lunches, coffee/tea and fruit. Students: 15 euro. The conference fee needs to be paid at the conference venue /registration desk when the conference starts.

Venue: University of Copenhagen, CSS (Social Science campus), Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen K – see http://polsci.ku.dk/english/contact/How_to_find_us/

Accommodation: There are plenty of hotels in Copenhagen. However, we have reserved rooms at two hotels close to the venue and the city. You need to book your own hotel room by mail or phone.

Ibsens Hotel Vendersgade 23 DK-1363 København K. T: 33 13 19 13 F: 33 13 19 16 E: hotel@ibsenshotel.dk Reservation: +45 33 95 77 44   Prices: Single Room: 985 DKK per room per night (includes breakfast). Double Room: 1.240 DKK per room per night (includes breakfast).

Hotel Kong Arthur Nørre Søgade 11 DK-1370 København K. T: +45 33 11 12 12 F: +45 33 32 61 30 E: hotel@kongarthur.dk Reservation: +45 33 95 77 22   Prices: Single Room: 1.225 DKK per room per night (includes breakfast). Double Room: 1.520 DKK per room per night (includes breakfast).

Don’t forget to mention that you are participating in conference organized by University of Copenhagen (Department of Political Science/ Sociology)

Sponsors: The Norbert Elias Foundation, Amsterdam The Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen The Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A sociology vacancy that mentions Elias!

The University of Leeds specifically mentions expertise on Elias (among others) in its advertisement for a vacant post in the Department of Sociology and Social Policy.

See:

http://jobs.leeds.ac.uk/fe/tpl_universityofleeds01.asp?s=ggpRoUZwJhYKpMmYhe&jobid=77866,5689562382&key=75702425&c=342323567145&pagestamp=selhnxblfrsylrtcsj

Is this a first?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Habermas and Elias

I’m in the middle of looking at what Habermas means by ‘refeudalization’ (in The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere), and it turns on his conception of ‘representative publicity’, one of his even more inelegant terms – the thing is that where he does talk about ‘representative publicity’, or the structuring of society and politics that constitutes it, it sounds a lot like an account of court society, with Habermas making very similar observations to Elias, citing Huizinga, etc. So, if anyone’s already looked at the Habermas – Elias connection in this respect, it’d be nice to hear from you…because, he seems to be arguing with the concept of refeudalization that the ‘structural transformation of the bourgeois public sphere’ constitutes a kind of ‘return’ to court society (representative publicity). Which strikes me as interesting.

Robert van Krieken

NOTE: Robert van Krieken will be giving a lecture on “The Refeudalization of Society? – On the new aristocracy and celebrity society – from Habermas to Elias” at UCD, Dublin, on 26 January 2012, at 15:00 in Room F102 in the Newman Building on the Belfield campus. All welcome.

Posted in Discussion | Leave a comment

ISA World Forum, RC20, Buenos Aires 1-4 August 2012

For some reason we haven’t posted this CfP on the blog earlier, but there is a session within RC 20 Comparative Sociology in the ISA World Forum in Buenos Aires, 1-4 August 2012, set aside for Eliasian or figurational papers. The twist is that the deadline for submitting abstracts is 15 December, so you’d need to get a proposal to Stephen and or myself by 10 December, to give us time to look over them. The session has been defined in the broadest possible terms, so it’s really very open-ended. Do please send us an abstract if you’re interested, by 10 December, and we’ll get back shortly after.

Comparative studies of historical and contemporary civilising and decivilising shifts in politics, culture and morality

Organisers
Robert VAN KRIEKEN, University of Sydney, Australia, robert.van-Krieken@sydney.edu.au
Stephen VERTIGANS, Robert Gordon University, UK, s.vertigans@rgu.ac.uk

This session will include comparative sociological research in the following areas:

a) The interrelationships between social justice and levels of pacification and, conversely, injustice and forms of violence;

b) Civilising processes and democratisation: comparative studies of civilisation in relation to democratic transformations around the world;

c) The rise of cross-boundary NGOs such as those associated with environmental, human rights and anti-capitalist movements and concomitant changing power relations;

d) Cultural comparators which are indicative of dynamics of civilising processes. Possible examples include emotions, literature, media, sexuality and sport.

Other topics which fit under the general heading will also be considered

Posted in Conferences, News | Leave a comment